Skip to main content

ACSL leads from the front as the 1st KEMI International Conference opens in Nairobi

Nairobi, Kenya | 13th April: The African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) took centre stage as lead sponsor, keynote speaker, moderator,  and chair across five days of Kenya’s newest flagship education leadership event.

The 1st International Conference of the Kenya Education Management Institute (KEMI) opened earlier today in Nairobi, under the theme “Catalysts for Transformation: Re-inventing Leadership in a Sustainable and Inclusive Education Ecosystem.” Drawing together over 300 education leaders and policymakers, researchers,  and practitioners from across Africa, Europe, Asia, and North America. The five-day gathering marks a significant moment for school leadership as a continental policy priority — and the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) is at its heart.

As lead sponsor of the conference, ACSL’s presence extends far beyond the plenary and panel sessions to the exhibition stand. Across all five days, ACSL colleagues from partner organisations ADEA, Education Sub-Saharan Africa (ESSA), and VVOB are contributing as keynote speakers, panel moderators, lead presenters, panellists, and day facilitators — making this the most concentrated demonstration of ACSL’s convening role on school leadership and technical depth on a single platform to date.

To set the stageDr. Maurice Odondo, CEO of KEMI, opened the proceedings by anchoring the conference in the realities of a rapidly changing world and the need for education leadership and management to match evolving demands. “Leadership is no longer administrative; it is transformational, adaptive, and future-oriented,” he said, calling on delegates to commit to “strong, visionary, and ethical leadership as the foundation upon which sustainable and inclusive education systems are built.”

The official opening address was delivered by Dr. Elyas Abdi, Director General of the State Department for Basic Education, on behalf of Principal Secretary — Amb. Julius Bitok. Dr. Abdi called for the week to be treated as a genuine inflection point: “The future of education depends not only on policies we design, but on the leadership we demonstrate. Let this not be just another conference, but a turning point for action and impact.”

The day’s keynote was delivered virtually by Albert Nsengiyumva, Executive Secretary of ADEA and a driving force behind ACSL’s continental mandate. Drawing on the 2025 ADEA Triennale Synthesis Report and CESA 2026–2035, he set out eight pillars for transforming education leadership across Africa — from governance and financing to data systems, technology equity, and continental harmonisation — with resilience as the cross-cutting thread running through all of them.

His framing was provocative. By 2040, Africa will be home to over one billion young people of working age. “One billion minds that will either be equipped — or abandoned. One billion futures that will either flourish — or be lost.” The question he placed before delegates was not whether Africa can transform its education systems, but what governments must concretely do now.

On financing, he was direct: “Africa does not have an education financing problem. It has an education financing priority problem” — noting that median African government education spending fell from 16% to 14.5% of total expenditure between 2016 and 2022, moving further from the 20% Dakar benchmark. On equity, he painted a sharp picture of systemic failure: “A child’s chance of being taught by a skilled, supported, motivated teacher — and led by a competent, empowered principal — depends almost entirely on where that child was born. That is not an education system. That is a lottery.”

His closing injunction carried the weight of the entire address: “Africa does not need more policy documents. It needs the political will to implement what is already known...So, let’s walk the talk.

The conference’s flagship panel discussion — Repositioning School Leadership as a Strategic Policy Driver for Education Transformation — was moderated by Shem Bodo, ADEA’s Senior Progams Officer and Senior Strategic Advisor at ACSL, bringing together voices from government, research, academia, and civil society to interrogate the persistent gap between policy and on-the-ground investment in school leadership. Panellists examined why school leadership continues to be treated as an extension of teaching in most African educational systems, rather than a distinct professional role requiring structured preparation, defined standards, and protected career pathways.

The opening day also featured the launch of the Kenya edition of the 2025 Spotlight Report Series, presented jointly by Dr. Manos Antoninis (Director, UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report), Martin Kungania (Deputy Director, Ministry of Education Kenya), and Prof. Martin Mutegi (University of Nairobi). The report makes the case that school heads must be understood not as administrators but as instructional leaders whose daily decisions are directly linked to the quality of learning in classrooms.

Day 1 was only the opening chapter. Across the remaining four days, ACSL colleagues will be active in some of the conference’s most significant sessions: On the second day, the conference’s flagship knowledge moment arrives early in the morning. Tom Vandenbosch, General Director of VVOB, delivers the Day 2 keynote — Shaping the Future of School Leadership through Professional Development. He will be followed immediately by the headline event of the conference: the formal launch and dissemination of the ACSL Continental Mapping Report on School Leadership Initiatives in Africa, to be presented by ACSL colleagues, Joyceline Kirezi and Caren Namalenya.

The School Leadership Continental Mapping Report represents the most comprehensive evidence synthesis on school leadership recently conducted on the African continent. Its findings confirm both the growing recognition of school leadership as a driver of education quality and the fragmentation, inequity, and under-institutionalisation that still characterise most systems across the continent.

Later on Day 2, Chantal Kabanda Dusabe moderates a panel on Beyond Compliance: Transforming Professional Development for School Leaders.

On the third day, ACSL’s Strategic Education Advisor on Gender and Equity, Sandrine Ishimiwe, joins a panel on Leading for Resilience: Advancing Equity and Inclusion in Education — bringing ACSL’s gender-responsive leadership agenda into one of the conference’s most substantive thematic discussions.

Day 4 will be facilitated by ACSL’s Communications and Advocacy Strategic Advisor, Chinedu Anarado, who will chair the full day’s proceedings — overseeing a packed programme that includes a panel on Digital Transformation and Innovation in School Leadership, a roundtable with heads of primary and junior schools on CBC implementation, and a panel on Financing Education Reforms: Unlocking Resources for Transformative Change, moderated by ACSL’s Policy Strategic Advisor, Mamadou Lamine Sow.

On the final day, ACSL Research Advisor, Dr. Leyla Abdullahi will moderate the panel discussion on Bridging Research and Policy: Leveraging Education Research to Transform School Leadership and Learning Outcomes. This before Tom Vandenbosh joins the other high-level officials in the closing formalities with remarks.

Transforming education leadership in Africa: eight pillars we cannot afford to ignore

By Albert Nsengiyumva, Executive Secretary, ADEA

Keynote Address at the 1st KEMI International Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, 13 April 2026

Distinguished guests, colleagues, fellow believers in the transformative power of education.

I want to begin with a number. Not a target, not a projection — a fact. By 2040, Africa will be home to the largest youth population the world has ever seen. More than one billion young people of working age. One billion minds that will either be equipped — or abandoned. One billion futures that will either flourish — or be lost.

The question — the only question that matters — is this: What must governments concretely do now to transform the leadership of those systems?

Drawing on the 2025 ADEA Triennale Synthesis Report and the Continental Education Strategy for Africa — CESA 2026 to 2035 — I present to you eight pillars, and one cross-cutting dimension, where political commitment and institutional courage must converge if we are serious about transformation.


Pillar 1: Governance and Institutional Reform

Let us start where every education system either stands or falls: governance. 

Decentralisation is not transformation. Decentralisation without accountability is merely dispersal. The Triennale was unsparing on this point — it identified middle-tier leadership: district officers, school support officers, instructional coaches — as the chronically under-resourced link where policy transformations most often fail.

We need Afrocentric professional standards for school principals. We need career pathways with teeth — licensing requirements, performance standards, and real consequences for persistent failure. And we need to invest in and formally recognise the African Centre for School Leadership as the institutional home for this work.

CESA 26-35 is explicit: Objective Six of its Strategic Area on Teachers, Educators, and Caregivers calls directly for investing in school leadership, including the share of female leaders. Not as a footnote. As a strategic objective.

School leaders are not administrators. They are the single most powerful lever in a school system after the quality of teaching itself. And yet in some African countries, a teacher can become a principal without any leadership training. That is not governance..

Governance must also anticipate the unexpected. Crisis management units embedded at every tier — national, district or county, and school — are not a luxury. They are the infrastructure that determines whether a system bends or breaks when emergencies arrive.


Pillar 2: Sustainable and Equitable Financing

The numbers in CESA 26-35 are sobering. Between 2016 and 2022, the median African country saw education spending fall from 16% to 14.5% of total government expenditure. Moving in the wrong direction. Against a benchmark of 20%. Against a UN recommendation of 6% of GDP. Against a continent that allocates barely 3.7%.

Africa does not have an education financing problem. It has an education financing priority problem.

The Triennale’s most politically significant contribution was to name this clearly: governments must start treating education as a strategic investment, not a cost.

For leadership specifically, this means budget lines for principal training academies, CPD infrastructure, and middle-tier coaching must be protected — especially during fiscal pressure, when they are the first to be cut.

One final point on financing that must be said plainly: education budgets are most vulnerable to cuts precisely when they are most needed — during fiscal crises, conflicts, and emergencies. Ring-fencing leadership development expenditure against these pressures is not a technical matter. It is a test of political commitment.


Pillar 3: Leadership Capacity Strengthening

I want to be direct: capacity strengthening in Africa has a credibility issue.

Too many of the “capacity strengthening” programmes are single workshops in hotel conference rooms, attended by nearly the same people, producing reports that are hardly read, and changing little.

The Triennale put it plainly: continuous professional development (CPD) needs to be made mandatory, systemic, and embedded in policy. For education leaders, this means annual CPD hours as a licensing requirement. Competency-based micro-credentials replacing generic certificates. Digital platforms that track participation and tie it to career progression.

We must anchor these national systems to the continental architecture that the African Union has already built: the African Continental Framework of Standards and Competencies for the Teaching Profession, the African Continental Teacher Qualification Framework, the Teacher Mobility Protocol. These instruments are not optional extras — they are the foundation on which credible national systems must be built.

Capacity strengthening must also prepare leaders for the unexpected. Trauma-informed leadership, emergency pedagogy, and psychosocial support are not specialist add-ons — they are core competencies for any education leader working in Africa today.

And leadership development must begin earlier. Not with the principal, not at the district, county, or provincial office. But in the classroom. This means leadership modules in pre-service teacher education, mentorship programmes pairing experienced leaders with emerging ones, and professional learning communities that operate with a coaching orientation — not an inspection one.


Pillar 4: Collaborative and Community-Centred Leadership

There is a leadership model deeply embedded in African philosophical tradition that the world is only now beginning to appreciate. Ubuntu. I am because we are.

And yet our school governance structures often contradict this entirely — communities consulted only ceremonially, School Management Committees with no real authority, parents informed rather than involved.

The Triennale called for governments to empower communities to participate actively and sustain the learning process. Not advise. Not consult. Participate. Sustain. That is a fundamentally different mandate.

And beyond communities — multi-stakeholder education compacts. Ministries, civil society, traditional leaders, the private sector, and learner bodies co-designing national strategies. South-South collaboration platforms through the African Union, ACSL, RTIA, and the AU Regional Economic Communities.

We are not short of African wisdom on education leadership. We are short of the institutional structures that let that wisdom flow from communities into policy.


Pillar 5: Data-Driven Leadership and Research

You cannot lead what you cannot see. And you cannot improve what you do not measure.

But let me be clear: this is not a call for more data for Ministries. It is a call for quality data — data that reaches leaders. Data that empowers principals to make instructional decisions. Data that enables officers at central and sub-national levels to target support. Data that gives School Management Committees and Parent-Teacher Associations real visibility into how their school is performing.

CESA 26-35 calls this EMIS 2.0 — the shift from aggregate statistics to individual learner tracking. Real-time. Disaggregated. Actionable. Designed not to produce annual reports, but to drive daily leadership decisions.

And alongside robust data systems, we need African research on African leadership. Not imported models that we take as is, but those which we can contextualise. We need African universities and think tanks, resourced to generate the evidence base that informs African leadership.

Because data without political accountability is just a dashboard nobody looks at, the Triennale called specifically for empowering political leaders and policymakers to use available data in meeting the promises they made to citizens. Annual school performance reports that are public. Parliamentary briefings that are regular. Community scorecards that are binding.


Pillar 6: Technology and Innovation

AI is already here. It is in our classrooms whether we have planned for it or not.

The question is not whether to embrace technology in education leadership. The question is whether we will design it for the last mile — the rural school with intermittent electricity and a principal who has never opened a dashboard — or only for the well-connected urban schools that need it least.

EdTech equity means offline-first tools, local language interfaces, and bandwidth-aware design. Digital CPD platforms that track professional development must work in the schools where leadership is most needed, not only in capitals.

And we must prepare education leaders for responsible AI. Not to fear it — to govern it. To ask: whose values does this AI algorithm reflect? Whose children does this system serve? These are leadership questions. They belong in every leadership development programme on this continent.


Pillar 7: Equity, Inclusion and Social Justice

In most African school systems today, a child’s chance of being taught by a skilled, supported, motivated teacher — and led by a competent, empowered principal — depends almost entirely on where that child was born. Representation at leadership level shapes every other equity outcome in a school system.

CESA 26-35’s Strategic Area Six — Gender, Equity, and Inclusion — makes the case not only morally but economically. Female school leaders are associated with better learning outcomes for all children. They reduce gender stereotypes. They serve as mentors for girls. And yet in most countries, women remain dramatically underrepresented in school leadership — despite, as the data shows, staying in the profession longer than their male counterparts.

Gender-disaggregated leadership data. Published promotion criteria. Mentorship programmes for women leaders. Quotas where underrepresentation is severe. These are not radical asks. They are basic governance hygiene.

And beyond gender — school leaders must be held accountable for equity outcomes: for learners with disabilities, for conflict-affected youth, for displaced and refugee learners, for girls who are at risk of dropping out.


Pillar 8: Regional and Continental Harmonisation

We are one continent. Fifty-four nations. Hundreds of languages. Different school systems.

But our biggest challenges — teacher shortages, leadership skill gaps, financing deficits, learning poverty — do not respect national borders. Neither do refugee crises, displacement flows, or the learning losses they leave behind. And our solutions should not either.

CESA 26-35 provides the overarching continental framework. ADEA provides the convening architecture. The African Continental Teacher Qualification Framework provides the portability mechanism. Initiatives like ACSL and RTIA, and the RECs platforms, provide the regional exchange platform.

What is needed now is for governments to actively align national leadership frameworks to this continental architecture — not as an external compliance exercise, but because the continent’s diversity of leadership experience is our greatest untapped resource.

A principal in Kenya who transformed her school’s learning outcomes has something to teach a district officer in Senegal. A Minister in Ghana who built a national leadership academy has something to offer a counterpart in Mozambique. We must build platforms that make this exchange systematic, not accidental.


The Cross-Cutting Dimension: Resilience, Crisis and Conflict Readiness

I have spoken of eight pillars. But there is a ninth dimension — one that does not sit alongside the others but runs through all the pillars. And on a continent where 244 million children and young people are currently affected by armed conflict, climate-induced disaster, or forced displacement, it is a dimension we cannot afford to treat as an afterthought.

The question is not whether African education systems will face crisis. They already are. The question is whether our leaders will be prepared.

Large class sizes are the daily reality for the majority of African school leaders. Distributed leadership — where teachers lead within their classrooms and communities within their schools — is not a compromise. It is the only model that can work at scale.

Emergency situations demand that crisis-sensitive planning be embedded in normal governance — not built from scratch when disaster strikes. Every dollar invested in preparedness saves up to fifteen dollars in recovery. And risk data must be in EMIS — not only achievement data.

Conflict and displacement test the very soul of educational leadership. Crisis-affected teachers and community members are the most knowledgeable about their context — and the furthest removed from the decisions that affect them. International actors must support local leaders, not bypass them. Trauma-informed leadership is not a specialist skill. It is a baseline requirement.

Local leadership is not a principle to aspire to in times of crisis. It is the only thing that works.

Resilience is not a separate strategy. It is what all eight pillars must be built to deliver.


Finally: Let Us Walk the Talk

The 2025 ADEA Triennale chose its words carefully when it named its outcome document Walk the Talk. Because the gap between what we know and what we do in African education is not a knowledge gap.

We know what works. We have known for decades. We have the research, the frameworks, the continental strategies, the regional platforms. What we too often lack is the political will to implement — and the accountability systems to ensure that what is promised is delivered.

None of these eight pillars is new. None of them is beyond the capacity of African governments to implement. And none of them will happen automatically — not from a strategy document, not from a conference resolution, not from a keynote speech.

They will happen when a Minister of Finance agrees, in a budget negotiation, to protect the line for leadership development.

They will happen when a district, provincial, or county officer, for the first time, has real-time data on which schools are failing — and the authority to act on it.

They will happen when a female principal in a rural school in the Sahel has the training, the support, and the authority to lead — and knows that her government sees her, and is investing in her.

Education leadership transformation is not a technical problem awaiting a technical solution. It is a political commitment to equity. A cultural investment in African identity and knowledge systems. And a generational responsibility to the one billion young people whose futures depend on the decisions we make — and the actions we take — in rooms exactly like this one.

Africa does not need more policy documents. It needs the political will to implement what is already known.

The headwinds are real. But the direction is clear. Let us walk the talk. Together.


Albert Nsengiyumva is Executive Secretary of the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and a champion of the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL). This address was delivered as the keynote speech at the 1st International Conference of the Kenya Education Management Institute, at the Safari Park Hotel, Nairobi, 13 April 2026. ACSL is a coalition of partners coordinated by ADEA, ESSA, FAWE, and VVOB.

Liberia validates findings from school leadership mapping exercise, charts strategic pathway to strengthening policy and practice

Thursday, April 2nd, 2026 

Building on a multi-year continental effort to map and strengthen school leadership systems across Africa, the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) recently completed a critical two-part engagement in Liberia — conducting a national school leadership mapping exercise and convening a national validation workshop in Monrovia on 31 March and 1 April 2026.

The mapping exercise engaged a wide range of national stakeholders, including the Ministry of Education, the University of Liberia, the Liberia University Commission, district and regional education officers, and school leaders and practitioners from across the system. The goal was to deepen understanding of what works in strengthening school leadership and to identify how best to support policy and practice in Liberia. Working in close collaboration with EDC — the in-country implementing partner for the Leaders in Teaching (LIT) initiative — the ACSL team gathered evidence grounded in the lived realities of Liberian school leaders and stakeholders.

While opening the validation workshop Assistant Minister for Teacher Education, Honorable Clifford Konah, Jr., powerfully framed the stakes of the exercise. He affirmed that visionary and accountable school leaders are indispensable in shaping schools that deliver meaningful learning outcomes, and described the mapping initiative as a critical and commendable step — one that ensures reforms are rooted in the life realities of Liberian schools.

“Central to this mission is the recognition that effective school leadership is the cornerstone of a functional, inclusive, and high-performing education system. Visionary and accountable leaders are indispensable in shaping schools that deliver meaningful learning outcomes. In the face of this goal, the initiative to map and analyze the current landscape of school leadership in Liberia represents a critical and commendable step. By emphasizing evidence-based decision-making, this process ensures that reforms are rooted in the life realities of our schools.”

The two-day validation workshop that followed brought together approximately 30 participants drawn from across Liberia’s education stakeholder community. The workshop was designed as an active, participatory process in which stakeholders led the proceedings and qualitatively shaped the outcomes — not merely as an audience to findings, but as co-owners of the evidence and its implications. Participants confirmed what aligned with their experiences, challenged what did not, and surfaced critical gaps not yet captured in the initial findings. Together, they built consensus around three to five strategic actions to meaningfully strengthen school leadership in Liberia.

On its second and final day, the workshop turned toward concrete action. Participants co-developed a context-driven action plan specifying key activities, roles, responsibilities, expected results, and means of verification for the immediate steps needed to advance school leadership development in the country. These priorities were deliberately anchored to current and future Education Sector Plan dispositions, ensuring the long-term sustainability and institutionalisation of the work.

The Liberia engagement forms part of a broader programme of national school leadership mapping exercises being conducted by ACSL across LIT countries, following similar engagements in Sierra Leone, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda, as well as a parallel continental mapping effort. The validated findings and agreed strategic priorities will directly inform the next phase of ACSL’s LEAD pillar support in Liberia, contributing to a stronger and more coherent school leadership ecosystem both nationally and across the continent.

Waiting to Lead: What African Schools Lose When Young Women Are Overlooked

By Caren Namalenya
Research Officer, Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA)

Across many African education systems, leadership is something one is expected to grow into slowly. Years of service matter. But there is an unintended consequence: youth leadership is often delayed rather than developed. 

In Uganda, for instance, teachers typically move through classroom roles, senior responsibilities, and deputy positions over 8–12 years, with headship expected only after a decade or more of active service (Ministry of Education and Sports Uganda, 2008CPD Framework, 2017). These guidelines are important. Experience matters, But systems are likely to miss the opportunity to benefit from fresh energy, new ideas, and adaptive thinking.  

For young women, this delay is even more pronounced. 

Although maternity leave is legally protected in most education systems, leadership pathways that emphasise seniority and uninterrupted service can unintentionally disadvantage women. Eligibility for school leadership often depends on years accumulated in specific roles and access to acting leadership opportunities, both of which may be postponed by maternity-related career breaks. As a result, readiness is often judged by uninterrupted service rather than demonstrated competence (UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2022;UNESCO, 2024World Bank, 2023). The Global Education Monitoring Report (UNESCO, 2025) further notes that many leadership pathways assume linear, uninterrupted careers, a dynamic that can create missed opportunities and delay women’s advancement into leadership roles.

Female school leaders remain significantly underrepresented, accounting for only 9%–21% of school leaders in most African countries (UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2022). This persists despite compelling evidence that schools led by women indicate higher rates of student progression, improved learning outcomes, and lower absenteeism  (UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2022World Bank, 2023). These findings challenge long-held assumptions about leadership readiness, yet they have not meaningfully reshaped leadership pathways.

The gap between evidence and practice was brought into sharp focus during a recent convening of the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL), held in Nairobi in February 2026. School leaders reflected on their journeys. Among them was one story that captured how structural barriers play out in real life.

Leadership in Practice: A Young Woman’s Journey from the Ground

 
Ms. Phyllis A. Wijenje​, FathiladhimPrimary & Secondary School, Mombasa- Kenya
Ms. Phyllis A. Wijenje, a young woman school leader from Fashilidhan Primary and Secondary School in Mombasa, Kenya, described entering leadership not through encouragement, but persistence. 

She stepped into spaces where relationships were already established, and belonging felt negotiated rather than assumed.
“You know when you go to meetings,” she reflected, “you find the older women school leaders who have formed their own circles. They have already built relationships, and it is difficult for them to accommodate you.” 

Her experience highlights a quieter but persistent barrier facing young women leaders: the absence of mentorship and professional networks when most needed. Leadership, for her, meant learning on the job while constantly proving her legitimacy, often without structured guidance or affirmation. 

What shifted her trajectory was formal leadership and management training she received from the Kenya Education Management Institute (KEMI). This training did not replace experience; rather, it strengthened it. It built her confidence, sharpened her practical skills, and provided a professional foundation that complemented her years into leadership. Today, she is recognised as one of the country’s high-performing school principals.

Her story matters because it reflects a broader moment of change in African education systems.

A Changing Context Demands a New Definition of Readiness 

Countries such as Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) reforms are redefining effective school leadership. These reforms call for participatory, learner-centred leadership (Competency-based school leadership) that extends beyond the school, requiring meaningful engagement with teachers, parents, communities, and local institutions to support holistic learning (Global Education Monitoring Report, 2025). 

Leadership is no longer confined to administration; it is increasingly relational, outward-facing, and deeply collaborative.

At the same time, education systems are adapting to digital changes and the rise of artificial intelligence. Today’s school leaders must be adaptable, innovative, and comfortable with change. These qualities are often more visible among younger leaders, especially when they are supported through structured training and mentorship.

Research links female school leadership with more collaborative practices, stronger teacher engagement, and more inclusive school environments, key drivers of school effectiveness, particularly during periods of such reform (UNESCO, 2024). Yet leadership readiness continues to be measured primarily by years served rather than impact delivered.

Redefining Readiness

Being young. Being a woman. Being a leader. 

This is not about bypassing experience. It is about redefining readiness. 

Leadership potential can be cultivated deliberately through early investment, structured training, mentorship, supportive networks, and inclusive leadership pathways.

If African education systems are serious about CBC reforms, equity, and improved learning outcomes, leadership pipelines must evolve. Systems must open doors earlier for youth, deliberately support women, and treat leadership development as a competency, evidence and impact–driven investment, rather than a reward for longevity.

The evidence is clear.

And stories, such as Ms. Phyllis Wijenje’s, remind us that when young women are ready to lead but made to wait, schools and students lose more than time.

Acknowledgement

This blog draws on insights from the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) validation convening held in Nairobi in February 2026. ACSL is a partnership coordinated by the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and implemented with Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA), the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), and VVOB – education for development. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from across Africa who participated in the consultations.

References

ADEA. (2023). School leadership, equity, and learning outcomes in Africa. Association for the Development of Education in Africa. https://www.adeanet.org

Education International. (2025). Gender-responsive leadership in education systems. Education International. https://www.ei-ie.org

Ministry of Education and Sports. (2008). Education (Pre-primary, primary, and post-primary) Act. Government of Uganda. https://www.education.go.ug

Ministry of Education and Sports. (2017). Continuous professional development framework and costed implementation plan. Government of Uganda. https://www.education.go.ug

UNESCO. (2024). School leadership and system reform in Africa. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/education

UNESCO. (2025). Global education monitoring report: Spotlight on school leadership. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report

UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2022). Female leadership and school outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa. UNICEF. https://www.unicef-irc.org

World Bank. (2023). Education leadership, learning outcomes, and system transformation. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education

World Bank Group. (2023). Increasing women’s representation in business leadership. World Bank Group.
 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39870

World Bank. (2023). Women, business and the law 2023. World Bank.
 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39462

From Deep Diving to Climbing High: Accelerating School Leadership for Quality Education

By Benjamini Masebo
Research Manager, ESSA

For many years, countries around the world have been working to improve the quality of education. A key question remains: What does it take to ensure every child receives quality education? The answer goes beyond access to schools. It includes strong teaching, effective leadership, and supportive education systems. 

Global commitments, such as Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4),  call for inclusive and equitable quality education and the promotion of lifelong learning opportunities for all. It is more than just an aspiration; it serves as a benchmark for measuring progress and holding countries accountable in their pursuit of better education systems.

On the African continent, the African Union and Africa Federation of Teaching Regulatory Authority ( AFTRA) have established a Continental Framework of Standards and Competences for the Teaching Profession(2019). The Continental Teacher Qualification Framework and  Continental Guidelines for the Teaching Profession follows a similar path. All these efforts aim to professionalise   teaching and raise standards across the continent. However, governments cannot achieve this alone. Partnerships with non-governmental organizations, research institutions, and development partners are essential.

One initiative playing a critical role in this space is the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL). ACSL  works with governments and governmental agencies in the education sector to strengthen school leadership  to improve teaching and, in turn, learning outcomes. The Centre brings together regional expertise   to ensure the delivery of high-quality professional development (PD) services, research, and policy advice. It operates as a consortium comprising Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA)Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA)VVOB – Education for Development, and the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE).

ESSA, a member of the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) consortium, leads the research focus area. As part of this role, ESSA has mapped research and researchers working on school leadership at both national and continental levels to inform policy and practice.

Recently, ACSL convened a three-day continental validation workshop in NairobiKenya, bringing together policymakers, researchers, practitioners, and development partners from across Africa. The purpose of the workshop was to review, refine, and validate findings from a comprehensive school leadership mapping report. The goal was simple: ensure the research reflects the real experiences and needs of African education systems.

The mapping report reviewed more than 1,700 publications from 2010 to the present, mapping research outputs in the field of school leadership. The report highlighted significant gender disparities among authors, with male researchers dominating the field. Findings show that a large majority of first authors were male, while female representation remained much lower. 

An uneven distribution of publications also emerged, with most coming from Southern and West Africa, while North and Central Africa contribute less. Much research focuses on school leadership roles, structures, models, and styles, with relatively little attention   to teaching and classroom practices, or to policy and system-level contexts.

Beyond these findings, participants emphasised the critical role of school leaders and teachers in improving learning outcomes.

Tracy Osuo of the Mastercard Foundation noted, “Teachers have a great impact on learning outcomes. Everyone has passed through the hands of teachers.”

Similarly, Prof. Michael Boakye-Yiadom, Director General of IEPA, University of Cape Coast, stressed the urgency of school leadership development: “We can’t just run; we must run very fast.”

Considering these challenges and findings, participants prioritized a research agenda for school leadership in Africa. Eight key areas were formulated and ranked from highest to lowest priority:

  1. Inclusive Leadership: Connecting theory to practice
  2. Adaptive School Leadership in fragile or crisis contexts
  3. School Leadership Models within Africa
  4. Distributed Leadership for empowering school leaders
  5. Lived experiences of school leaders in selected public and private schools
  6. Mental health and psychosocial support for school leaders in vulnerable contexts
  7. Succession planning in school leadership
  8. School Leadership and Early Childhood Development

These priorities signal a new beginning in approaching school leadership research, policy, and practice in Africa. A renewed sense of momentum for school leadership at the continental level has emerged. Participants have formed a community of practice to ensure this momentum is sustained and to foster collaboration across countries, institutions, and research networks. The momentum was captured by one speaker in his closing remarks: 

“We have deep-dived; now it is time to climb high. Our continent speaks in hundreds of voices. As we grow, our materials, research, and tools need to reflect this diversity, especially linguistic diversity to mobilise more people and strengthen this movement.” Tom Vandenbosch, VVOB Education for Development

The metaphor of “deep diving” and “climbing high” captures the moment perfectly. Africa has examined its evidence base and now stands at a turning point, moving from mapping what exists to shaping what must come next. This momentum has the potential to transform how school leadership research informs policy, strengthens professional development, and drives practical improvements in teaching and learning across the continent. By combining evidence, collaboration, and contextually relevant leadership approaches, Africa can ensure that school leadership becomes a powerful lever for quality education for all.

Acknowledgement

This blog draws on insights from the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) validation convening held in Nairobi in February 2026. ACSL is a partnership coordinated by the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and implemented with Education Sub-Saharan Africa (ESSA), the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), and VVOB – education for development. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from across Africa who participated in the consultations.

From Instructional Leadership to Leadership in Teaching: Why Africa Must Reframe the Conversation

By Leila Abdullahi
Director of Research and Programme Delivery, Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA)

Across Africa, school leadership is often framed as “instructional leadership”. But what if the more important question is how leadership enables teaching?

During the recent validation convening of the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) hosted in Nairobi, Kenya, in Feb 2026, this question quietly took shape and ultimately inspired this reflection. The workshop was more than a technical review meeting. It became a moment to rethink how Africa understands school leadership. 

ACSL is implemented through a partnership between Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA)VVOB – education for developmentAssociation for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA), and Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE). The initiative aims to strengthen school leadership systems across the continent through research, policy engagement, and professional development.

Through its role in the ACSL partnership, ESSA participated in these discussions, contributing perspectives on the emerging research agenda for school leadership in Africa.

The convening brought together researchers, regulators, policymakers, and practitioners from across Africa to examine emerging findings and refine the next phase of continental action.

Across plenaries, breakout sessions, and informal exchanges, one issue emerged with unusual clarity:

Africa must rethink its understanding of school leadership.

The Limits of the Traditional Model

For many years, instructional leadership has dominated global conversations about school improvement. Much of this thinking comes from the Global North, with model’s emphasising the principal’s role in:

  • Supervising teaching
  • Monitoring lesson delivery
  • Tracking performance data
  • Enforcing curriculum compliance

These responsibilities matter. However, the framework often assumes a hierarchical, top-down structure where leadership flows in one direction; from principal to teacher.

  • It is supervisory.
  • It is evaluative.
  • It is managerial.

During the ACSL workshop discussions, participants reflected on how this framing often does not fully capture the realities of African schools.

Across many African systems:

  • Principals are simultaneously administrators and classroom teachers.
  • Data systems are uneven, fragmented, or still developing.
  • Professional learning is often informal, peer-driven, and practice-based.
  • Authority is shaped by cultural norms and community relationships.
  • Leadership is deeply relational, not merely procedural.

These realities demand a more context-responsive lens.

When applied without adaptation, instructional leadership can easily become compliance-oriented rather than transformative, risking a reduction in leadership to monitoring and reporting.

It becomes a checklist, rather than a culture of teaching and learning.

A Shift in Perspective: Leadership in Teaching

A powerful reframing emerged from the workshop discussions:

What if we move from “instructional leadership” to “leadership in teaching”?

This is not just a change in wording, but a shift in perspective. 

Leadership in teaching  recognises that:

  • Leadership is not confined to a position.
  • Improving teaching is a shared responsibility
  • Professional growth is co-created
  • Authority can be shared, negotiated, and culturally embedded

Rather than focusing on the supervision of instruction, it focuses on creating conditions that enable teaching to improve.

In many African schools, distributed leadership is already happening. Senior teachers mentor their peers. Communities shape school priorities. 

The challenge, therefore, is not inventing new leadership but rather recognising, studying, and strengthening the leadership practices that already exist within African systems.

For policymakers and education systems, this shift means investing not only in principal supervision skills, but also in collaborative professional learning, distributed leadership practices, and school cultures that support continuous improvement in teaching.

What the Workshop Revealed

The ACSL validation convening revealed several critical tensions:

1. Conceptual Ambiguity

Terms such as instructional leadership, distributed leadership, transformational leadership, and system leadership are often used interchangeably without clarity.

2. Imported Terminology

Leadership frameworks embedded in policy documents often originate from outside Africa and have limited validation in local contexts.

3. Classroom Disconnect

Many leadership research measures administrative behaviour rather than the real impact on teaching and learning.

4. Limited Afrocentric Perspectives

African studies on culturally grounded leadership exists but are scattered and insufficiently documented.

Throughout the discussions, there was broad agreement on one issue:

Africa requires clearer leadership definitions.

A Practical Step Forward

One key recommendation from the convening is the development of a continental standard document on school leadership terminology with relevant context.

Such a document would:

  • Provide clear definitions of core leadership concepts
  • Clarify how each concept translates into African school contexts
  • Distinguish supervisory, relational, system, and pedagogical leadership functions
  • Align leadership language with classroom impact
  • Serve as a shared reference for policymakers, researchers, and professional development providers

Without definitional clarity:

  • Research fragments
  • Policy language drifts
  • Leadership training loses focus

A continental reference framework would not impose uniformity; it would create coherence while allowing contextual adaptation across diverse education systems.

Rethinking Instructional Leadership as a Research Priority

The discussions also suggested that revisiting the concept of instructional leadership itself should become a priority area for future research. While instructional leadership has long shaped global education debates, there is still limited evidence on how the concept operates within African school systems and whether it adequately reflects the relational, collaborative, and context-driven nature of leadership observed across many schools. Examining how instructional leadership is interpreted, adapted, or redefined in African contexts can help move the conversation toward leadership in teaching, grounding leadership frameworks in the realities of classroom practice and school environments across the continent.

From Validation to Vision

As the ACSL validation convening ended, one message was clear:

Africa does not lack leadership practice.
What it lacks is a strong, evidence-based understanding of that practice.

The next phase of work must therefore focus on:

  • strengthening conceptual clarity
  • documenting Afrocentric leadership models
  • aligning research, policy, and professional development
  • investing in sustainable leadership research pipelines

School leadership is widely recognised as a powerful lever for improving education systems.

But unless it is anchored in teaching and grounded in African realities, its transformative potential will remain limited.

Reframing the conversation toward leadership in teaching may offer the pathway needed to better connect research, policy, and classroom practice across the continent.

Acknowledgement

This blog draws on insights from the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) validation convening held in Nairobi in February 2026. ACSL is a partnership coordinated by the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and implemented with Education Sub-Saharan Africa (ESSA), the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), and VVOB – education for development. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from across Africa who participated in the consultations.

Strengthening School Leadership in Uganda: From Policy to Practice

By Edmund Nibeneeh Aalangdong (PhD), Head of African Centre for School Leadership Research

Across Africa, improving the quality of education increasingly depends on a single critical factor: effective school leadership. School leaders, particularly headteachers, are not just administrators, they shape how teaching happens, support teachers, manage resources, and influence student success.

To support this, the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) was established as a Pan-African initiative to strengthen school leadership systems through research, training and policy engagement across the continent.ACSL works in partnership with regional and international organisations, including Education SubSaharan Africa (ESSA)VVOB – education for developmentAssociation for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA), and Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE),to build a stronger evidence base on school leadership in Africa and support countries to develop stronger and more connected leadership systems.

As part of this broader continental effort, ACSL led a school leadership mapping exercise in Uganda to understand how leadership works across policy, training, research   and coordination.  

ESSA played a key role in coordinating and supporting the process. It helped design the research, review and combine findings, engage stakeholders, and validate the results. A Strong Policy Foundation

Uganda has an operational policy for education leadership. The system is decentralised, with   the Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES) guiding the implementation at the district and school levels. 

Several national frameworks reinforce the importance of leadership in education. These include the Education Act (2008), the National Teacher Policy, and the Continuous Professional Development (CPD) Framework, which clearly defines the role of headteachers. They emphasise skills such as strategic planning, team leadership, change management, and effective resource utilisation.

These frameworks also align with Uganda Vision 2040, which positions education as a key driver of national development (National Planning Authority, 2013). However, despite strong policies, implementation across the system is not always consistent.

Fragmented Leadership Systems

One major challenge is fragmentation.  Uganda does not have a dedicated policy focused on school leadership. Instead, leadership is spread across multiple policies (ACSL, 2026). 

Many organisations, including government agencies, universities, NGOs, teacher unions, and development partners, are involved in leadership development. a While this is positive, coordination is often insufficient. As a result, initiatives happen in isolation rather than as part of a unified system.

To address this, stakeholders have proposed creating a School Leadership Taskforce under the Leaders in Teaching (LiT) programme to improve coordination and allignment efforts (VVOB, PEAS & ACSL, 2025). 

Professional Development: Available but Uneven

Leadership development opportunities for school leaders exist across Uganda but remain unevenly accessible.

Most headteachers gain leadership skills after years of teaching and further studies at institutions, including Makerere University, Kyambogo University, and the Uganda Management Institute. 

In-service training is common, with support from government and development partners.  However, access varies by region, and many initiatives rely on external funding (ACSL, 2026). 

Moreover, there is limited structured support for new headteachers. This means many school leaders assume their roles without proper mentoring.

A Growing but Limited Research Landscape

The mapping exercise identified 53 research publications on school leadership in Uganda between 2010 and 2025, reflecting a modest but gradually expanding body of knowledge.

Most research concentrates on leadership styles, particularly transformational and instructional leadership, and show that strong leadership improves teaching and student outcomes.

However, there are still major gaps. Very little research looks at:

  • Gender and inclusive leadership
  • Leadership in rural or low-resource schools
  • Digital leadership and education technology
  • Crisis leadership and system resilience
  • Leadership development pathways

Equity issues are particularly underexplored.  Of the 53 studies identified in the mapping exerciseonly about sixstudies explicitly address gender and none on disability or inclusive education in relation to school leadership.

Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Practice

Another challenge is that research is not widely used or easily accessible.

Many studies remain inaccessible, stored in university libraries instead of being shared openly. Policymakers and practitioners rarely engage deeply with research findings, and dissemination is limited to one-off workshops with little follow-up (ACSL, 2026).

At the school level, data collection is often motivated by reporting requirements rather than school improvement. Improving data literacy and use among school leaders and district education officials could greatly enhance the use of evidence in decision-making.

A Way Forward: Building a Coherent Leadership Ecosystem

To strengthen school leadership in Uganda, the following priorities were highlighted during the validation workshop:

  1. Develop a coherent national policy framework dedicated to school leadership.
  2. Introduce structured induction and mentoring for new headteachers.
  3. Improve coordination across leadership development providers through platforms such as a national school leadership task force.
  4. Expand research on school leadership, particularly in areas such as gender equity, inclusive education, digital leadership, and leadership development pathways.
  5. Make research more accessible through open platforms and continuous engagement between researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.

Leadership as the Engine of Education Reform

There is a common saying in Uganda: “Show me a good school, and I will show you a good headteacher.”

This reflects a core truth. Effective school leadership is not just about management; it is about creating conditions for teachers to perform well, learners to succeed, and communities to engage meaningfully in education.

Uganda has already laid a strong foundation. The next step is to connect policy, practice, research, and professional learning into a coherent system.

If this happens, Uganda’s school leaders will be better placed to spearhead the real and lasting improvements in Uganda’s education.

Acknowledgement

This blog draws on insights from the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) validation convening held in Kampala, Uganda in March 2026. ACSL is a partnership coordinated by the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and implemented with Education Sub-Saharan Africa (ESSA), the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), and VVOB – education for development. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from across Africa who participated in the consultations.

References

African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL). (2026). Mapping of school leadership initiatives in Uganda: Desk review report. ESSA, ADEA, FAWE & VVOB. 

Government of Uganda. (2008). Education (Pre-Primary, Primary and Post-Primary) Act. Kampala: Government Printer.

Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES). (2017). Continuous Professional Development Framework and Costed Implementation Plan for Teachers and School Leaders. Kampala: MoES.

Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES). (2019). National Teacher Policy. Kampala: MoES.

National Planning Authority. (2013). Uganda Vision 2040. Kampala: Government of Uganda.

VVOB, PEAS & African Centre for School Leadership. (2025). Leaders in Teaching (LiT) – LEAD Pillar: School leadership mapping and taskforce proposal.

How to Design a Community of Learning That Lasts: Lessons from an African Expert

By Leila Abdullahi
Director of Research and Programme Delivery, Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA)

Many Communities of Learning begin with energy but lose momentum over time. The difference often lies in how intentionally they are designed.

At a recent validation convening of the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) hosted in Nairobi, Kenya in Feb 2026, participants gathered to reflect on an important question: how do we build a continental Community of Learning that truly lasts? 

ACSL is implemented through a partnership between Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA)VVOB – Education for DevelopmentADEA (Association for the Development of Education in Africa), and FAWE (Forum for African Women Educationalists)The initiative aims to strengthen school leadership systems across the continent through research, policy engagement, and professional development.

ESSA plays a central role in supporting the research and knowledge exchange components of ACSL, including helping shape the emerging Research Community of Learning to strengthen collaboration among African researchers, policymakers, and school leadership practitioners.

Within this scope, the Community of Learning emerged as a natural next step. We began exploring what it would take to establish a continental Community of Learning on school leadership. But, before discussing structures, platforms, or governance models, we paused to confront a more difficult question:

Why do so many Communities of Learning begin with energy, only to lose momentum quietly?

Rather than guess, we listened. Researchers, school leaders, university academics, and policy actors reflected on the networks they had built or participated in, including principal forums, university–school partnerships, writing retreats, and cross-country collaborations. One insight became unmistakable:

Communities last when they are intentionally designed to endure.

Structure Matters More Than Motivation

Several experts described initiatives that began with genuine commitment and strong participation. Early meetings were lively. Collaboration felt promising.

Yet without clear coordination, defined roles, documented processes, and continuity mechanisms, responsibility slowly fades. As one participant put it:

“There must be a learning hub, otherwise we’ll be penning to fate.” 

Anonymous, ACSL workshop, February 2026.

For example, during the convening, participants reflected on past regional networks that had strong initial participation but gradually weakened when there was no clear coordinating hub responsible for convening meetings, documenting outputs, and maintaining momentum across countries.

Communities cannot rely solely on personalities. They require a structure, a centre of gravity that ensures coherence beyond individual effort.

For ACSL, this means pairing a dedicated coordinating function with distributed leadership across nominated experts and country-level focal points.

Momentum Thrives on Consistency

Another clear pattern emerged: communities that endured were consistent in operations. They met at fixed intervals. Agendas were circulated in advance. Output was expected. Writing retreats were linked to publication timelines. Engagement was predictable rather than occasional.

Where this rhythm is missing, meetings slipped, and follow-up weakens. Gradually, participation declines.

Continuity is less about intensity and more about consistency.

If a Community of Learning is to succeed, engagement must be embedded in calendars and institutional routines.

Value Drives Commitment

Participants were candid: people remain active when participation strengthens their work.

Networks that thrived offered mentorship, peer review before journal submission, collaborative proposal development, joint conference panels, and visible recognition of contributions.

Those who struggled often offered conversation without clear progression.

Connection is important.
Contribution is essential.

A continental Community of Learning must produce outputs, research publications, policy briefs, collaborative grants, and comparative studies that support members’ professional growth and influence.

The ACSL Research Hub model already envisions a cycle from provocation to knowledge exchange to collaborative production. That production dimension must remain central. Ensuring that these exchanges translate into tangible outputs will be critical for sustaining engagement.

Governance Enables Continuity

Clarity of roles emerged as another decisive factor.

Experts emphasised the need to define who convenes, who documents, how leadership rotates, and how country-level initiatives align with continental direction.

Communities that relied solely on informal relationships struggled during transitions. Those with documented roles and transparent processes navigated change more effectively.

Governance, in this sense, is not bureaucracy. It is a continuity.

For ACSL and its partners, ESSA, VVOB, ADEA, and FAWE, this reinforces the need for shared leadership and clear accountability mechanisms embedded from the outset.

Technology Is a Tool, Not the Solution

The discussion on digital platforms was equally grounded.

Participants raised questions about data protection, connectivity constraints, integration with academic profiles, and mechanisms for tracking visible progress.

A digital platform can enhance coordination and visibility. It can showcase outputs and connect members across geographies. However, it cannot create engagement on its own.

Design precedes technology.

If implemented, the platform must support clear milestones, collaborative workspaces, and recognition of contributions rather than becoming another dormant portal.

From Reflection to Design

These reflections are shaping how we approach crafting the ACSL Community of Learning.

Rather than launching broadly, ESSA and ACSL partners are considering a phased approach, anchored by nominated experts across thematic areas, which may provide a stronger foundation. These experts could guide programming, mentor emerging researchers, and strengthen linkages between country-level and continental priorities.

The aim is not to form another network. It is to build a coherent ecosystem capable of influencing research, policy, and leadership practice over time.

A Final Reflection

Communities of Learning do not lose relevance because interest fades.

They lose relevance when structure, cadence, value, and clarity are taken for granted rather than embedded.

If ACSL establishes a continental Community of Learning, it must be deliberately rooted in partnership, guided by expertise, and matched with real leadership challenges.  

The measure of success will not be the number of members who join at launch. It will be whether, years from now, the community remains active, producing knowledge, mentoring scholars, informing policy, and strengthening school leadership systems across Africa.

Acknowledgement

This blog draws on insights from the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) validation convening held in Nairobi in February 2026. ACSL is a partnership coordinated by the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and implemented with Education Sub-Saharan Africa (ESSA), the Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE), and VVOB – education for development. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from across Africa who participated in the consultations.

Latest edition of Spotlight Report unpacks the role of school leader in foundational learning across Africa

The African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL), in partnership with the African Union and the UNESCO Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report, has launched the third edition of the Spotlight Report on Education in Africa. The report titled, Lead for foundational learning, makes a compelling and timely case for improving school leadership and the capacity of school leaders if the continent wants to sustain its growth trajectory. It recommends that improved learning outcomes require urgent, sustained attention on who leads schools and how they lead.

The report places school principals, head teachers, and local education authorities at the centre of efforts to transform early-grade learning. It argues that school leaders must prioritise instructional leadership — equipping their teams with clarity on learning objectives and teaching methodologies, even when resources are severely constrained.

Beyond the classroom, effective school leadership, the report finds, involves creating engaging and inclusive learning environments while maintaining productive relationships with teachers, parents, and local education officials. These dual demands — pedagogical and relational — define the scope of the leadership challenge facing Africa’s schools today.

Evidence Grounded in African Realities

The third edition of the Spotlight series draws on some of the most comprehensive, Africa-specific evidence gathered to date. Its findings are informed by:

  • A survey of school principals and parent representatives across approximately 300 primary schools in five focus countries: CameroonCôte d’Ivoire, KenyaMorocco, and Zimbabwe.
  • Interviews with local education authorities in the same five countries.
  • Detailed policy analysis of school leadership frameworks in Kaduna State, Nigeria and Rwanda.
  • Country case studies examining language of instruction in Algeria, learning outcomes in Burundi, pre-primary financing in Cape Verde, decentralisation in Congo, and school feeding programmes in Mali.
  • Background research on national assessment frameworks, community engagement, competency-based curricula, and primary school infrastructure financing across the continent.

Data reviewed in the report reveals significant progress, including improved school enrolment, existence of school leadership policies and systems. But it also says that fewer than 11% of children in Africa achieve the minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics by the end of primary school — the threshold considered essential for children to continue learning and realise their full potential.

A policy dashboard to drive action

The report’s recommendations are supported by a new dashboard of policy indicators designed to guide evidence-based dialogue on foundational learning. The dashboard is being developed under the African Union’s Leveraging Education Analysis for Results Network (LEARN)  and aligns with the Continental Education Strategy for Africa 2026–2035 (CESA 26–35).

This tool is intended to help governments, regional bodies, and development partners track, compare, and strengthen school leadership policies in a systematic and data-driven way.

Building on the Spotlight Series

The Lead for Foundational Learning report is the third in the Spotlight on Education in Africa series, a flagship initiative that provides an authoritative continental stocktake on key dimensions of Africa’s education systems. This edition reflects ACSL’s core conviction: that professionalising school leadership is not a peripheral concern but a central lever for transforming learning outcomes in the early grades — and ultimately, across an entire generation.


The Spotlight Report on Education in Africa is produced in partnership with the African Union and the UNESCO Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report. Download the full report or read the summary.

Stakeholders validate report and co-create pathways to continental school leadership reforms across Africa 

Nairobi, Kenya | February 2026

School leadership policymakers, practitioners, and researchers from across Africa validated the findings of the first continent-wide mapping of school leadership initiatives at a workshop in Nairobi from the 10th to the 13th of February 2026. They also commenced the process of developing a pathway toward more coherent, institutionalised leadership systems across African educational systems. These were the main outcomes of a three-day validation workshop convened by the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) in partnership with the Kenya Education Management Institute (KEMI)

Policymakers, regulatory authorities, researchers, school leaders, and development partners reviewed and validated the findings from a comprehensive mapping exercise that assessed the status of school leadership policy, research, professional development, certification, sector coordination, and advocacy pathways across the continent. The study unpacked several insights and findings including the following:

  • Policy attention is increasing, but many countries lack coherent leadership standards, structured progression pathways and low level of awareness of school leadership policies.
  • Professional development remains fragmented, often project-based and donor-driven rather than institutionalised within national systems.
  • Research is growing but uneven, with significant gaps in accessibility, comparability, and longitudinal evidence.
  • Gender and inclusion gaps persist, with women underrepresented in leadership positions and limited documentation of leadership practices in marginalised and crisis-affected contexts. This is also the case for persons with disability.

School leadership is widely recognized as second only to classroom teaching in its influence on learner achievement, shaping instructional quality, teacher motivation, school climate, and the effective use of resources. Throughout the first two days—which featured presentation of findings and a deep dive into the research landscape—participants consistently emphasized that strengthening school leadership is central to improving learning outcomes. They also stressed the importance of adopting a holistic understanding of leadership—one that goes beyond classroom instruction to encompass the broader culture, governance, and direction of the school. As one participant aptly noted, “the head is the school, and the school is the head,” underscoring the profound influence of school leaders on the identity, performance, and overall trajectory of their institutions.

Discussions on the final day focused on moving from policy to practice, especially professional development of school leaders, and exploring modalities for stronger link between country-level action and regional and continental frameworks alignment, including with the African Union Continental Education Strategy for Africa 2026-2035 (CESA 26–35) and the outcomes of the 2025 ADEA Triennale in Accra, Ghana. 

Participants underscored the need to institutionalise preparation and certification pathways for school leaders, develop clear leadership standards aligned with teaching and learning outcomes; strengthen structured professional development and coaching systems, build gender-responsive and inclusive leadership pipelines and enhance coordination between research, policy, and practice.

The workshop co-created a draft continental school leadership roadmap, outlining priority actions and mechanisms for coordination and accountability. Other key highlights include consensus on the need for stronger collaboration across ministries, regulatory bodies, training institutions, and partners. At the continental participants pushed for improved connection with the African Union, regional economic communities and member states in shaping, harmonizing and implementing school leadership policies and standards. 

Participants agreed to advance a continental community of practice and a coordinated coalition of partners to support the implementation of the recommendations, backed by structured monitoring mechanisms to track progress.

As African educational systems expand access to secondary education and accelerate reforms at the foundational and other learning levels, strengthening school leadership in its holistic form is increasingly seen as a strategic lever for system-wide transformation. ACSL and its founding consortium partners — ADEA, VVOB, ESSA, and FAWE — will continue working with African countries and partners to translate the roadmap into actionable reforms at national level, guided by regional and continental frameworks. The final validated mapping report will be published in the coming weeks.

The session featured contributions from national and continental institutions and policymakers including the African Union, East African Community (EAC), Africa Federation of Teaching Regulatory Authorities (AFTRA), Teachers Service Commissions from Kenya and Sierra Leone, The UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report (UNESCO GEM-R), Ministries of Education from Ghana, Kenya, Liberia and Uganda, Institute for Education Planning and Administration (IEPA). Researchers from Lagos State University, University of Botswana, Moi University, University of Buea, University of Rwanda-College of Education, University of Pretoria, South African Council of Educators amongst others. 

School leadership stakeholders call for coherent policy and institutionalised leadership development in Africa

School leadership stakeholders in Africa have called for a coherent and institutionalised process for developing school leaders. The call was made during the opening session of a three-day workshop (10–12 February) in Nairobi to validate findings from the first continent-wide mapping of school leadership initiatives in Africa. The workshop was organised by the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) in partnership with the Kenya Education Management Institute (KEMI).

The convening brought together education leaders, policymakers, researchers, school principals, and development partners at regional and continental levels. Over three days, participants will review, refine, and validate the mapping findings while co-creating a continental roadmap to strengthen school leadership systems.

School leadership is widely recognised as a decisive lever for learning—second only to classroom teaching in its influence on learner outcomes. Research shows that effective school leaders shape what happens in classrooms by strengthening instructional quality, motivating and supporting teachers, creating a positive and safe school climate, engaging parents and communities, and ensuring the strategic use of resources to improve learning. This is why ACSL is deepening its engagement on school leadership across Africa—particularly at the secondary level, which is increasingly central to preparing young Africans for the world of work.

In his keynote address, the Director General at Kenya’s Ministry of Education, Dr. Elyas Abdi, described the workshop as timely as education systems implement sweeping reforms—from curriculum change and expanded access to digital integration and heightened demands for accountability and equity. Drawing on evidence, he emphasised that school leadership ranks second only to classroom teaching in its influence on learner outcomes, calling for a shift in mindset:

“Leadership is not a side issue. The success or failure of education reform is inseparable from the quality of leadership at the school level. School leadership must be understood not as an individual attribute, but as a system-level policy priority and a strategic public investment.”

He also framed the validation process as a strategic step toward coherence and action:

“This workshop is not a routine technical exercise. It is a critical platform for strengthening the credibility, relevance, and usefulness of the continental mapping.”

The CEO of KEMI and co-host of the workshop, Dr. Maurice Odundo, underscored the urgency of professionalising school leadership across African systems, pointing to a persistent capacity gap that undermines reform implementation at school level. He stressed that the mapping’s value depends on a rigorous validation process that strengthens its completeness and usability for decision-makers.

“Many school leaders across Africa take up leadership roles with little or no formal preparation,” he added: “Evidence is most useful when it is reviewed, contextualised, and owned by stakeholders,”

setting the tone for a collaborative, practitioner-informed dialogue.

In her opening remarks, Nuria Moreno, ACSL Programmes Manager, situated the workshop within ACSL’s broader mission to strengthen school leadership as a driver of improved teaching, learning outcomes, and learner well-being.

“Our objective is clear: build supportive school leadership systems that strengthen teaching and improve learning outcomes and well-being for all.”

She emphasised that ACSL’s theory of change focuses on system reform—aligning policy, professional development, research, and advocacy around coherent leadership pathways.

For the Mastercard Foundation, a strong base of school leadership is essential to ensuring that more young people receive the support they need to transition successfully into the world of work. Tracy Osuo, Lead for Secondary Education (Access and Success) at the Mastercard Foundation, linked the school leadership agenda to the rapid expansion of secondary education across Africa.

“Increasingly, secondary education is emerging as a key platform to the world of work for the majority of young people on the continent. Recognising secondary education as a platform to work is a paradigm shift.”

Preliminary findings: a continent-wide diagnostic

In a presentation and discussion session, the ACSL research team shared the rationale, methodology, and preliminary findings from the mapping. Key insights include:

  • Evidence gaps: Research on school leadership is growing, but uneven across regions and not easily accessible to policymakers—reinforcing the need for more African-led, comparative, and longitudinal studies linked to outcomes.
  • Policy gaps: Policy attention is increasing (aligned with CESA 2026–2035), but many countries still lack coherent frameworks and clear pathways from preparation to certification and progression.
  • Capacity gaps: Leadership professional development is expanding, yet remains fragmented—often donor-funded and project-based—with promising blended and school-based models not fully institutionalised.
  • Equity gaps: Gender and inclusion barriers persist; women remain underrepresented in leadership, and leadership in rural, marginalised, conflict-affected, and climate-vulnerable contexts is under-documented.

A key outcome of Day 1 was the deliberate use of plenary discussions and group validation sessions to test the accuracy and completeness of the preliminary mapping and to deepen recommendations. Participants contributed additional initiatives and perspectives that may not be visible through desk review alone—particularly given acknowledged limitations, including an English-language bias that can limit coverage of Francophone, Lusophone, and Maghreb contexts. Participants also reiterated the need for coherent, institutionalised policy processes that strengthen instructional leadership and support teacher development.

The opening day advanced the mapping from a research product into a more actionable, stakeholder-owned resource—strengthening its credibility and utility for governments, professional development institutions, and partners seeking to build coherent school leadership pipelines. The workshop will culminate in a co-created continental roadmap and a final validated mapping report, scheduled for publication on the ACSL website by the end of March 2026.

ACSL commemorates the 2026 International Day of Education – School leaders as the bridge to youth agency

On the 24th of January every year, the global community celebrates the International Day of Education. For 2026, the African Centre for School Leadership (ACSL) stands in solidarity with young people across Africa whose voices, creativity, and aspirations are central to shaping the future of education—and, by extension, the future of the continent. The 2026 global theme, “The power of youth in co-creating education,” reminds us that education systems thrive when young people are recognised as active agents in their learning journeys. Youth participation does not emerge in isolation, it is enabled—or constrained—by the quality of leadership within schools.

Across Africa, school leaders occupy a pivotal position at the intersection of policy, pedagogy, and lived experience. They shape whether classrooms are spaces of silence or dialogue, fear or belonging, compliance or curiosity. When school leaders are equipped to listen, include, and lead with purpose, young people gain more than academic knowledge: they gain confidence, agency, and the belief that their ideas matter.

At ACSL, our work is grounded in the understanding that youth is future, and that youth voice is inseparable from leadership practice. Through our leadership development programmes, research, and continental platforms, we support policymakers, principals and head teachers to foster inclusive school cultures where students are encouraged to question, collaborate, and contribute meaningfully to their learning environments. These conditions are essential not only for improved learning outcomes, but for preparing young people to navigate life beyond school with dignity, resilience, and purpose.

This is exemplified in our various initiatives and projects such as the Leaders in Teaching (LIT) initiative in Tanzania, where we are strengthening the capacity of 6000 school leaders in partnership with the Mastercard Foundation. Our continental school leadership mapping initiative is helping us set up a one-stop-shop for all school leadership support services in Africa. We demonstrated the efficacy of these services during our foundation phase – from 2022 to 2024 – in Ghana, Kenya and Rwanda.

At ACSL, we believe that youth agency is foundational to building pathways toward meaningful and fulfilling lives. When students experience voice and agency in school, they are better prepared to shape their futures—whether in further learning, work, entrepreneurship, or civic life. In this sense, school leadership plays a critical role in linking education to broader life outcomes, including employability, social cohesion, and well-being.

On this International Day of Education, ACSL reaffirms its commitment to strengthening school leadership across Africa as a catalyst for youth agency and long-term transformation. We stand with young people, educators, and policymakers in advancing education systems that do not merely teach, but empower—systems that recognise young people not only as learners, but as co-creators of their futures.

We call on policymakers and political leaders to recognize the role of school leadership in shaping the future, and thus strengthen the capacity of teachers and school leaders to build the young people who are the torch-bearers of our tomorrow.